The significant growth of banking frauds, fueled by the underground economy of malware, raised the need for effective detection systems. Therefore, in last the years, banks have upgraded their security to protect transactions from frauds. State-of-the-art solutions detect frauds as deviations from customers’ spending habits. To the best of our knowledge, almost all existing approaches do not provide an in-depth model’s granularity and security analysis against elusive attacks. In this paper, we examine Banksealer, a decision support system for banking fraud analysis, evaluating the influence on the detection performance of the granularity at which the spending habits are modeled and its security against evasive attacks. First, we compare user-centric modeling, which builds a model for each user, with system-centric modeling, which builds a model for the entire system, from the point of view of the detection performance. Then, we assess the robustness of Banksealer against malicious attackers that are aware of the structure of the models in use. To this end, we design and implement a proof-of-concept attack tool that performs mimicry attacks, emulating a sophisticated attacker that cloaks frauds to avoid detection. We experimentally confirm the feasibility of such attacks, their cost and the effort required to an attacker in order to perform them. In addition, we discuss possible countermeasures. We provide a comprehensive evaluation on a large, real-world dataset obtained from one of the largest Italian banks.